Sweepstakes Casino Controversy – And Celebrities’ All-important Role

The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise looks before the Louisiana Senate for Friday’s hearing on illegal sports betting.

No, they weren’t personally in presence, however the world-famous celebs were notably consisted of in a slide discussion on social and sweepstakes casinos – the controversial websites using both complimentary casino-style games and lucrative rewards, such as cash, gift cards or cryptocurrency. In one ad, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anybody can ‘bet complimentary,’ while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The sites are just two cogs in the multibillion-dollar market that now discovers itself besieged by claims. In the eyes of numerous gaming corporations, not to discuss suit complainants and state regulators, sweepstakes gambling establishments act as traditional gambling establishments, just without the oversight, customer protections and tax laws. So not just can they avoid the steep 24-percent federal gambling levy, however sweepstakes operators aren’t subject to regulatory hurdles like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming protections.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in revenue in 2015 alone. Now the company faces allegations of illegal sports betting in a New york city suit that declares VGW utilizes celeb endorsers to ‘create a veneer of legitimacy’ around its product. (See VGW’s statement listed below)

‘I’m not sure” if you do not trust us, you can trust Paris Hilton” is a winning message for business operating multibillion-dollar illegal operations out of locations like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,’ Friday’s presenter, Howard Glaser of gaming corporation Light & Wonder, told DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers consist of a variety of stars from gambling lovers Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, in addition to NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George – none of whom offer any differences in between conventional gaming and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, among many sweepstakes gambling establishments found online

Ryan Seacrest urges fans to play at Chumba Casino, where lots of – but not all – video games are totally free

Drake has an offer with social sweeps gambling establishment, Stake, that he frequently promotes on social media

Read More

Donald Trump ‘set to call NBA team owner as US ambassador to Italy’

Instead, advertisements usually center around the social aspect of the casinos, while leaving out the potential for actual gambling losses.

Others lure consumers with promises of prizes. One such operator, Stake, ran a social media ad displaying Drake’s vehicles, planes and estates before rotating to video of the rap artist playing online casino-style games.

‘Daddy, why do we have a lot cash?’ check out the very first caption on the screen.

Another caption described: ‘Because I never ever gave up.’

The disparity in between gaming websites and social or sweepstakes gambling establishments is a bit complicated, however operators of the latter insist they’re not involved with the previous.

A spokesperson for an industry trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), discussed its members are not in direct competitors with online gambling establishments and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA data, the majority of the players on social-sweepstakes casinos are playing for totally free.

‘Most social sweeps clients never make a purchase,’ the SPGA representative told DailyMail.com. ‘The minority of consumers who make purchases do so in quantities far smaller than the common deposit or bet size at real-money online gambling sites.’

Social casinos offer customers an opportunity to play casino-style video games with friends. Players have the option to buy worthless currency often referred to as ‘gold coins,’ which can not be exchanged for real cash, however can be utilized to open various functions within the video games.

But within the world of social gambling establishments exists sweepstakes video gaming, enabling customers to get other currency understood as ‘sweeps coins’ that can be exchanged for cash or other rewards.

And therein lies the capacity for financial losses, like the ones claimed by complainants in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York City. One gamer told the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes gambling establishments in the past year after continuing to purchase more coins in pursuit of money and other things of value.

The Philadelphia 76ers’ Paul George is seen promoting a Worldwide Poker event

Social sweeps gambling establishment Stake ran an advertisement flaunting Drake’s automobiles, planes and mansions

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York City Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW’s Global Poker

Traditional online gambling establishments are prohibited in all but seven states, which has actually helped to sustain the popularity of sweepstakes casinos.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes websites, which do not require generally need recognition. However, sites like Chumba will ask for IDs from gamers attempting to withdraw any funds.

Many websites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, permit consumers to send mail-in demands for complimentary sweeps coins, offered the players follow painfully particular directions. What’s more, players are typically rewarded with sweeps coins merely for signing up, thereby providing a factor to try their hands at any variety of gambling establishment games for a chance to win – or lose – real cash.

So why are sweepstakes sites enabled to operate in 48 states, while online gambling establishments are banned in all however 7?

According to the stakeholders, their product is the totally free casino-style gaming, and the real-stakes competitors is merely a means of promoting their bread and butter.

‘Social sweepstakes games are just a kind of online home entertainment,’ an SPGA representative told DailyMail.com by e-mail. ‘No purchase is needed to play at social casinos with sweepstakes prizes. Consumers never need to pay for a chance to win rewards. That absence of a purchase requirement – or” factor to consider” – is a crucial distinction in between social sweeps and traditional online gaming sites like casinos.’

Think of the way that McDonald’s utilizes its annual Monopoly video game to promote its food: Customers aren’t paying to gamble, but rather they’re purchasing hamburgers and fries that provide them the chance to win profitable prizes, such as a $1 million prize.

And without a purchase requirement, or ‘consideration’, the game itself does not satisfy the definition of sports betting in the US.

‘Sweepstakes are a long-standing method for promoting all sort of everyday companies in the United States, everything from burgers to publication subscriptions to coffee and home improvement stores,’ the SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com. ‘Sweepstakes promotions are frequently utilized by a who’s who of family names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.’

But to numerous gambling industry insiders, that argument doesn’t cut it.

For starters, gaming lawyer Daniel Wallach mentions, McDonald’s Monopoly video game does not run indefinitely. Rather, it has a well-defined beginning and end, thereby recommending the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant’s primary item. Instead, the sweepstakes is being used to promote real items like french fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.

‘They do not last permanently and they’re usually not tied to casino-style video games of opportunity,’ Wallach told DailyMail.com. ‘They’re simply money giveaways.

‘The sweepstakes [casinos] possess none of the qualities frequently associated with McDonald’s-design sweepstakes promotions,’ Wallach continued. ‘Besides running in eternity, the sweepstakes gambling establishments use” casino-like” payments, normally 80 percent or more of profits, whereas the typical payout percentage for a temporary marketing sweepstakes is an insignificant share of the profits made by the business [usually less than one percent]’

Wallach fasts to liken the online social sweeps gambling establishments to the internet coffee shops that sprang up in Florida, using clients the possibility to play casino-style video games for genuine prizes. Much of those brick-and-mortar establishments have given that been shuttered over accusations of prohibited gambling.

DJ Khaled is among numerous celebrity spokespeople for VGW’s Global Poker brand

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps casinos need to deal with similar examination.

‘These distinctions are not approximate,’ Wallach stated of social sweeps gambling establishments. ‘They have actually been cited by courts and state attorney general of the United States as essential aspects in identifying that a sweepstakes promo remained in reality a guise for illegal sports betting.’

One of the casino industry’s leading trade organizations, the American Gaming Association, is now pushing lawmakers to examine sweepstakes operators and, in many cases, enact new legislation on the issue.

‘Consumers are being denied of defenses and states are passing up substantial tax and profits opportunities as this sports betting changes that carried out through managed channels,’ checked out a well-circulated AGA memo.

And then there are the complainants who have actually sued social casinos in more than a dozen states.

Sweepstakes gambling establishment operators paid a combined $14.2 million in four different cases in Kentucky without confessing any misbehavior, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW accepted pay $11.75 million in one class-action suit, stating the settlement was made to avoid legal costs and continued lawsuits.

Michael Phelps has actually signed a deal with the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the newest claim, which is largely comparable to its predecessors, New york city state residents Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both declare to have lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is described in the filing as an ‘prohibited gambling enterprise. ‘

Apple and Google have actually also been called as offenders in lawsuits for hosting the sweepstakes websites. But unlike VGW, neither tech company responded to DailyMail.com’s ask for remark.

‘We usually do not comment on matters before the courts,’ a VGW spokesperson told DailyMail.com through email. ‘However, we keep in mind that this claim has actually only simply been submitted with the court and VGW has not been formally served.

‘We have full self-confidence in our compliance with all laws and guidelines where we operate, and stay confident about the future,’ the representative continued. ‘We continue to provide our free-to-play games across the majority of The United States and Canada, as we have for more than a decade, producing not only great games, user experiences and entertainment, however also guaranteeing this is done securely, responsibly and at the highest level of standards.

‘More broadly, we ‘d repeat that class actions and other lawsuits and arbitrations are relatively common throughout the online social video games market (and the US more broadly), and our standard practice is that we intend to intensely defend any claim which may be brought versus us.’

The concerns between traditional online gaming and sweepstakes casinos could prove troublesome for some celeb endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers’ George both back VGW’s Global Poker brand name while the NBA is partnered with standard video gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

‘It’s ironic that professional athletes are hawking prohibited sports betting wagering ‘sweeps’ websites while at the very same time the leagues want to project a strong position versus prohibited gambling – specifically when attempting to tamp down the periodic gaming scandal,’ Glaser informed DailyMail.com.

It was simply eight months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter received a life time ban from the NBA over allegations he conspired with gamblers. However, to be clear, Porter’s scandal is unrelated to anything involving social or sweepstakes gambling establishments.

Together with VGW, Apple and Google are being demanded hosting presumably illegal gambling websites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes gambling establishments as a significant problem for leagues such as the NBA.

‘I ‘d anticipate that a league crackdown on professional athletes endorsing sweepstakes websites is a matter of when, not if,’ Glaser added.

Neither an NBA spokesperson nor the gamers’ agents reacted to DailyMail.com’s ask for remark. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps also disregarded to react to DailyMail.com e-mails.

Asked if their celeb endorsers have a duty to explain to customers the differences and similarities in between iGaming and sweepstakes casinos, VGW firmly insisted there is nothing more that requires to be done.

‘We have complete confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial collaborations, and our organization practices more broadly,’ the spokesperson said. ‘A few of our values are” our players come first” and” we do what’s right”, and we put our worths at the core of everything we do.’

Glaser, an outspoken challenger of sweepstakes websites, sees things differently.

‘Celebrities who provide their names to shady prohibited gaming sites are, at a minimum, putting their track records at risk in addition to courting civil and class actions by consumers who allege harm,‘ Glaser stated. ‘There is likewise some danger that state regulators and state attorney generals of the United States rope celebrity endorsers into enforcement efforts for assisting in prohibited sports betting.’

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton